CliftonStrengths vs Big Five, 16PF & Enneagram: Which Assessment is Right for You?
Comprehensive comparison of CliftonStrengths against Big Five, 16PF, HEXACO, and Enneagram assessments. Understand the differences, strengths, and best use cases.
CliftonStrengths vs Big Five, 16PF & Enneagram: Which Assessment is Right for You?
With dozens of personality and strengths assessments available today, choosing the right one can feel overwhelming. Each assessment serves different purposes and provides unique insights, but understanding their differences is crucial for making an informed decision.
This comprehensive comparison examines CliftonStrengths alongside four other popular assessments: Big Five, 16PF, HEXACO, and Enneagram. We'll explore their purposes, methodologies, strengths, and ideal use cases to help you choose the assessment that best fits your goals.
Assessment Overview: What Makes Each Unique
CliftonStrengths: Talent-Based Development
Purpose: Identify natural talents and develop them into strengths Focus: What you do best and how to do more of it Approach: Strengths-based development rather than personality typing
Big Five (OCEAN): Research-Backed Personality
Purpose: Measure broad personality dimensions scientifically Focus: How personality traits predict behavior and outcomes Approach: Dimensional scoring on five major personality factors
16PF: Professional Personality Assessment
Purpose: Comprehensive personality measurement for professional contexts Focus: Detailed personality factors for workplace applications Approach: Multi-factor personality assessment with 16 distinct traits
HEXACO: Ethics-Enhanced Personality
Purpose: Personality assessment with emphasis on ethical behavior Focus: Six personality dimensions including honesty-humility Approach: Enhanced personality model with cultural validity
Enneagram: Motivation-Driven Types
Purpose: Understand core motivations and psychological patterns Focus: Why you do what you do (motivations and fears) Approach: Nine distinct personality types with growth paths
Detailed Comparison Matrix
Core Philosophy and Approach
Assessment | Core Philosophy | Primary Focus | Development Approach |
---|---|---|---|
CliftonStrengths | Build on natural talents | Individual talents and strengths | Develop strongest areas |
Big Five | Traits predict behavior | Personality dimensions | Understand and adapt traits |
16PF | Comprehensive personality measurement | Professional applications | Balanced development |
HEXACO | Personality with ethical component | Individual and cultural differences | Trait awareness and management |
Enneagram | Understanding core motivations | Internal drivers and growth | Transform motivational patterns |
Scientific Foundation
CliftonStrengths
- Research Base: 50+ years of talent research by Gallup
- Sample Size: 27+ million people assessed
- Validation: Extensive workplace performance studies
- Reliability: High test-retest reliability for talent identification
Big Five
- Research Base: 80+ years of personality research
- Sample Size: Thousands of studies across cultures
- Validation: Most researched personality model
- Reliability: Excellent psychometric properties
16PF
- Research Base: 70+ years of factor analytic research
- Sample Size: Extensive international normative samples
- Validation: Strong occupational and clinical validity
- Reliability: High internal consistency and stability
HEXACO
- Research Base: 20+ years of cross-cultural personality research
- Sample Size: International studies across multiple cultures
- Validation: Strong cross-cultural validity
- Reliability: Good psychometric properties
Enneagram
- Research Base: Ancient wisdom tradition with modern psychology
- Sample Size: Growing but less extensive than other models
- Validation: Limited but increasing scientific validation
- Reliability: Moderate, varies by instrument quality
Results Structure and Output
CliftonStrengths Results:
- 34 talent themes ranked by dominance
- Top 5 signature themes (most common)
- Four domains: Executing, Influencing, Relationship Building, Strategic Thinking
- Detailed action items for each theme
Big Five Results:
- Scores on five dimensions (0-100 scale)
- Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism
- Trait-level descriptions and implications
- Behavioral predictions and recommendations
16PF Results:
- 16 personality factors with detailed descriptions
- Global factors (Big Five equivalents)
- Professional report with career implications
- Leadership and team development insights
HEXACO Results:
- Six dimensional scores
- Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, eXtraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness
- Behavioral predictions and career implications
- Cross-cultural personality insights
Enneagram Results:
- Primary type identification (1-9)
- Wing influences and variations
- Stress and security patterns
- Growth recommendations and paths
Strengths and Limitations of Each Assessment
CliftonStrengths
Strengths:
- Positive Focus: Emphasizes development of natural talents rather than fixing weaknesses
- Actionable Results: Provides specific strategies for applying each talent theme
- Workplace Application: Designed specifically for professional development and performance
- Unique Combinations: Recognizes individual uniqueness (33+ million possible combinations)
- Research-Backed: Extensive validation for workplace performance and engagement
Limitations:
- Limited Scope: Focuses primarily on talents, may miss other important aspects
- Positive Bias: May not adequately address development areas or potential blind spots
- Cost: Requires purchase from Gallup, making it less accessible
- Cultural Context: Primarily developed and validated in Western business contexts
Best For:
- Career development and planning
- Team building and organizational development
- Performance improvement initiatives
- Strengths-based coaching and development
- Leadership development programs
Big Five (OCEAN)
Strengths:
- Scientific Rigor: Most researched and validated personality model
- Predictive Power: Strong predictor of job performance and life outcomes
- Universal Application: Cross-culturally valid and widely applicable
- Balanced View: Provides comprehensive personality picture without bias
- Free Assessments: Many quality versions available at no cost
Limitations:
- Complexity: Can be difficult to interpret and apply without training
- Static View: Describes personality but provides limited development guidance
- Broad Factors: May miss nuanced aspects of personality
- Negative Focus: Can emphasize weaknesses rather than strengths
Best For:
- Academic and research applications
- Personnel selection and hiring
- Understanding personality's impact on behavior
- Self-awareness and personal development
- Cross-cultural personality assessment
16PF
Strengths:
- Comprehensive: Provides detailed, nuanced personality assessment
- Professional Focus: Designed for workplace and professional applications
- Balanced Approach: Addresses both strengths and development areas
- Flexibility: Can be used for various organizational purposes
- Established History: Long track record in professional settings
Limitations:
- Complexity: 16 factors can be overwhelming to interpret and remember
- Length: Longer assessment time commitment
- Cost: Professional versions require certification and fees
- Overlap: Some factors may seem redundant or overlapping
Best For:
- Executive coaching and leadership development
- Career counseling and guidance
- Team development and dynamics
- Organizational assessment and development
- Professional selection and development
HEXACO
Strengths:
- Ethical Focus: Unique emphasis on honesty-humility dimension
- Cultural Validity: Better cross-cultural applicability than Big Five
- Predictive Power: Good predictor of ethical behavior and integrity
- Research-Based: Strong psychometric foundation
- Balanced Approach: Comprehensive personality assessment
Limitations:
- Limited Recognition: Less known than Big Five or other major models
- Fewer Resources: Limited development materials and applications
- Newness: Relatively recent model with less extensive validation
- Complexity: Six dimensions can be complex to interpret
Best For:
- Roles requiring high ethical standards
- Cross-cultural organizational contexts
- Leadership selection and development
- Research and academic applications
- Understanding ethical dimensions of personality
Enneagram
Strengths:
- Motivational Insight: Focuses on why people behave as they do
- Growth-Oriented: Provides clear paths for personal development
- Depth of Understanding: Offers profound insights into psychological patterns
- Practical Application: Easy to understand and remember types
- Holistic Approach: Addresses both healthy and unhealthy manifestations
Limitations:
- Limited Scientific Validation: Less research support than other models
- Typing Complexity: Can be difficult to accurately identify type
- Oversimplification: May reduce complex personalities to simple types
- Subjective Elements: Relies on self-awareness that may be lacking
Best For:
- Personal growth and self-development
- Relationship building and understanding
- Spiritual and psychological development
- Team dynamics and communication
- Understanding motivational patterns
Choosing the Right Assessment: Decision Framework
Consider Your Primary Goals
Career Development and Performance
- Primary Choice: CliftonStrengths
- Secondary: Big Five or 16PF
- Why: Focus on talents and workplace application
Team Building and Organizational Development
- Primary Choice: CliftonStrengths or 16PF
- Secondary: Big Five
- Why: Professional focus with actionable team insights
Personal Growth and Self-Awareness
- Primary Choice: Enneagram or Big Five
- Secondary: CliftonStrengths
- Why: Deep personal insights and growth orientation
Leadership Development
- Primary Choice: 16PF or CliftonStrengths
- Secondary: Big Five
- Why: Professional applications with leadership focus
Cross-Cultural Applications
- Primary Choice: HEXACO or Big Five
- Secondary: CliftonStrengths
- Why: Strong cross-cultural validity
Ethics-Sensitive Roles
- Primary Choice: HEXACO
- Secondary: 16PF
- Why: Focus on ethical behavior and integrity
Consider Your Context and Constraints
Time and Resources
- Quick Assessment: Big Five (many free options)
- Comprehensive Assessment: 16PF or full CliftonStrengths
- Budget-Friendly: Big Five or Enneagram
Professional vs. Personal Use
- Professional: CliftonStrengths, 16PF, Big Five
- Personal: Enneagram, Big Five, CliftonStrengths
Group vs. Individual Application
- Group/Team: CliftonStrengths, 16PF
- Individual: Any assessment depending on goals
Combining Assessments: A Multi-Modal Approach
Why Use Multiple Assessments?
Different assessments provide complementary insights:
- CliftonStrengths: What you do best
- Big Five: How you typically behave
- Enneagram: Why you do what you do
- 16PF: Comprehensive professional profile
Effective Combinations
For Comprehensive Self-Understanding: CliftonStrengths + Enneagram
- Strengths for professional development
- Enneagram for personal growth and motivation
For Career Development: CliftonStrengths + Big Five
- Talents for role fit and development
- Personality traits for work style and environment
For Leadership Development: 16PF + CliftonStrengths
- Comprehensive personality assessment
- Specific talent development focus
For Team Development: CliftonStrengths + Big Five
- Individual strengths for role assignment
- Personality traits for team dynamics
Implementation Best Practices
Before Taking Any Assessment
Set Clear Intentions
- Define what you want to learn or achieve
- Consider how you'll use the results
- Prepare to act on insights
Choose Quality Assessments
- Use validated, reliable instruments
- Consider professional vs. free versions
- Read reviews and research the provider
After Receiving Results
Deep Dive Into Understanding
- Read full reports and descriptions
- Reflect on accuracy and relevance
- Seek feedback from others who know you
Create Action Plans
- Identify specific development goals
- Plan concrete steps for improvement
- Set timelines for reassessment
Share and Discuss
- Discuss results with trusted colleagues or friends
- Use insights to improve relationships and collaboration
- Consider professional coaching or development support
Long-Term Application
Regular Review
- Revisit results periodically
- Track progress on development goals
- Notice changes and growth over time
Integration with Other Tools
- Combine with other development approaches
- Use in performance reviews and goal setting
- Apply to new roles and opportunities
Assessment Recommendations by Use Case
Individual Career Development
Recommended: CliftonStrengths + Big Five Why: Talents for career direction, personality for work style fit
Team Building
Recommended: CliftonStrengths Why: Clear individual contributions and team complementarity
Leadership Development
Recommended: 16PF or CliftonStrengths + Big Five Why: Comprehensive leadership assessment with development focus
Personal Relationships
Recommended: Enneagram + Big Five Why: Deep motivational understanding with behavioral predictions
Cross-Cultural Work
Recommended: HEXACO or Big Five Why: Strong cross-cultural validity and applicability
Ethics-Sensitive Roles
Recommended: HEXACO + 16PF Why: Integrity focus with comprehensive professional assessment
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Over-Relying on Results
- Remember assessments are tools, not absolute truth
- Consider context and situational factors
- Balance assessment insights with other information
Boxing Yourself or Others In
- Avoid limiting beliefs based on results
- Remember personality and strengths can develop
- Stay open to growth and change
Ignoring Development Areas
- Even strengths-focused approaches require balance
- Consider how lesser strengths impact performance
- Develop strategies for managing around lesser areas
Using Wrong Assessment for Purpose
- Match assessment to your specific goals
- Consider the assessment's strengths and limitations
- Don't force an assessment to serve purposes it wasn't designed for
Conclusion: The Right Assessment for Your Journey
Choosing between CliftonStrengths and other personality assessments isn't about finding the "best" assessment—it's about finding the right assessment for your specific goals, context, and development needs.
Choose CliftonStrengths if you want to focus on talent development, improve workplace performance, or build stronger teams through strengths awareness.
Choose Big Five if you want comprehensive, scientifically validated personality insights that predict behavior across various contexts.
Choose 16PF if you need detailed professional assessment for complex organizational applications like leadership development or career counseling.
Choose HEXACO if you work in cross-cultural contexts or roles where ethical behavior is paramount.
Choose Enneagram if you're focused on personal growth, understanding core motivations, or improving relationships through deeper self-awareness.
Remember, the most powerful approach might involve using multiple assessments over time, each providing unique insights that contribute to your overall self-understanding and development journey.
The key is to choose intentionally, engage deeply with your results, and most importantly, take action based on your insights. Any assessment is only as valuable as the development and growth it inspires.
Take Your Next Assessment
Ready to discover more about yourself through personality and strengths assessment?
- Take the CliftonStrengths Assessment - Discover your natural talents
- Try the Big Five Test - Understand your personality dimensions
- Explore the 16PF Assessment - Get comprehensive professional insights
- Take the HEXACO Test - Assess personality with ethical focus
- Try the Enneagram Assessment - Understand your core motivations
Each assessment offers unique insights—choose the one that best aligns with your current development goals.